21 March 2009

The Buddy Chat

There is a family gathering in Winter Park, FL, for my uncle, Jess Gregg (known as "Buddy" to the family), this afternoon. Today would have been his 90th birthday. I wrote this piece to be read at that gathering.

In December 1985, Uncle Buddy called me while I was home for the holidays from college. “Why don’t you and I have a little chat?” he said in a voice that was amiable but filled with purpose.

The “Buddy chat” was a consistent element of my return visits to Winter Park. They carried a certain element of the unexpected — I never could guess what might be on his mind. I felt an air of mystery surrounding my uncle, the artist whose life was so different from that of anyone else I knew. He was an unlikely father figure to me, one of three patriarchs in my life. While my father gave me a love steeped in the kindness and selflessness more closely akin to a proud grandfather, and while Uncle Don strove to equip me with important life tools, Buddy’s role in my life seemed to be tending to my respect for family and its history.

For instance, the earliest Buddy chat that I can remember occurred at the original Ark, Dean B.’s house. Buddy called me to an upstairs room and pointed out some weaponry displayed on a wall — I believe it was a pistol — and told me what he knew of its history, how it had belonged to an ancestor in the Civil War who fought for the Union, and how he was shot through the wrist of an arm while holding the sword that directed his regiment into battle. A memorable story for a 9-year-old boy.

“Someday,” Buddy promised in conclusion, “when you’re old enough to take care of these things, this will be yours.” I think I understood even then that my uncle wasn’t giving me a gun or some family possession; he was entrusting me with an important piece of Gregg oral history.

There was a ritual to my visits with Buddy: the tea and cookies, of course, prepared and served lovingly by Leo. During this time I would catch them up on my life. And then Buddy would inevitably say: “Let’s take a little walk,” and out the door we would go, walking the quiet brick streets of the neighborhood, or heading down to the edge of the tiny lake in his back yard, his quiet, sonorous tones sharing a concern that had been on his mind, perhaps about me, perhaps about him, perhaps about Mom or Dad.

Like many artists, Buddy was concerned with what legacy he would leave behind, but more than that he was thinking about the Gregg, Ogilvie and Bailey legacies. He was aware that, on paper at least, this branch of the Gregg surname would die with him, and it was important that some of us in a younger generation understand what we could of its history.

+ + +

As it turned out, the visit in ‘85 had a different purpose. After the usual tea and cookies, Jess directed me me to sit on the edge of the bed in his and Leo’s bedroom. He presented me with a small manila envelope with the words “The Underground Kite” written in black Sharpie. It contained what appeared to be three poems. Buddy explained that a dramatic reading of a new play of his was to be produced in Orlando, and that the production needed three songs. He wanted me to write the music to his lyrics. He read them out loud to me, not singing but imbuing his voice with a musical rhythm. He talked about Leadbelly, the folk blues musician, whose style these songs should most closely resemble.

I accepted the task with some trepidation, mostly pride. I walked on air for the next few days, feeling like all of a sudden, rather than simply being a mentor he was inviting me to collaborate with him. Some of that fog of “mystery” surrounding him seemed to dissipate. This was an acknowledgement from my clearest pardigm of an artist that I too was an artist, that I deserved that respect.

I never got to see the production, but I did get a copy of the program with my songwriting credit. I’m pretty sure my music was not exactly what he was looking for: as much as I, a white, middle-class boy at a private midwestern college, tried, I was not going to capture the passion and craft of an early 20th-century black musician who spent years on chain gangs in the Deep South. But the experience served to mature my relationship with Jess, and it helped me carry my artistic self with more conviction.

And that conviction is perhaps the most important gift that Jess and Leo have both given me. My parents, of course, spent a great part of their lives in the arts, but for me they were “stuck” always being parents first. With the little bit of distance Jess and Leo had, they became for me the purest examples in this family of a life guided by art. Jess’s commitment to his writing has been a constant source of inspiration in my own artistic pursuits, most recently my writing. He’s shown me that it can be done. He has given me license to think of myself as a writer, an artist. I can’t think of a better legacy.

A couple of days ago, I was listening to an interview with the writer Dennis Palumbo. He spoke of the value of committing to a life of writing, and in his words I recognized Jess, hunched over his typewriter — or later, his laptop — summoning the muse.

Dennis said:

Writing is a lifelong pursuit. It’s very hard for writers to do this, but they have to take the long view — they have to take the view that they’re going to be doing this, year after year, for most of their life. And that fads and genres come and go, and overnight successes come and go, but the real beauty and sublime joy in writing is the day-to-day engagement with your creative self. To do that every day, you accumulate over the long haul a real sense of connection with yourself, and with what makes you human and makes everyone else a human.


I hope that Jess and I will continue our chats on a regular basis.

29 November 2008

NaBloPoMo 10: A Tag, Not of the Skin Variety

Thanks, Parenthetical, for the tag — my first time being tagged on this blog.

Here's the goods on how this works:

  1. Link to the person who tagged me. (That's what that link up above is, so I'm cruising right along in my directions.)
  2. Post the rules on your blog. (Even as I type!)
  3. Write six random things about yourself. (Comin' up.)
  4. Tag six people at the end of your post and link to them.
  5. Let each person know they've been tagged and leave a comment on their blog.
  6. Let the tagger know when your entry is up. (That seems redundant to step 5, but who am I to quibble with the powers that be.)
Okay. So. Six random things about me:

  1. In high school, I had an addiction to tonic water ... so much so that at my 18th birthday (which doubled as a going-away party before I left for college), my friends gave me 25 1-liter bottles of the stuff. Canada Dry, I believe.
  2. Valerie Harper (of Rhoda fame) introduced me on a nationally televised telethon to raise money for the victims of one of those Mississippi River floods in 1993. I performed my songs "Saving The Levee" and "Invisible Locket."
  3. I am unbelievably excited that Piper is getting to be old enough to start watching some of my favorite movies when I was a kid (i.e., Star Wars, E.T., Xanadu ... Ohmygod, did I just say that last one out loud?). I can't imagine that every parent doesn't feel this way.*
  4. The first movie I saw in a theater was Sleeping Beauty. I hid on the floor when the wicked queen turned into the dragon.
  5. If I could do it all again, I would want to be a professional athlete, for the sole reason that I could give much better interviews than those dolts can ever give.
  6. My wedding ring has a chip of Laura's birthstone in it, and Laura's has a chip of my birthstone. I know: it's disgusting, isn't it?
Okay, so I have to stick six other friends with the task of sharing their random thoughts of themselves. So ... Catharine Chronicles, Jason, Scandal of Particularity, Squidlicious, and ...

Uh oh. I don't read six other blogs. I'm sorry, but four is the best I can do. Don't hate me because I'm anti-social!


* An anecdotal addendum to #3 above: When I was about 12, a national network showed Gone With the Wind as one of those sweeps month "television events." GWTW is my mother's favorite movie, and she reallly wanted me to watch it. No, you're not hearing me: she really wanted me to watch it. I, however, did not want to waste a good night's television viewing (I'm sure there was a kickass episode of Happy Days on that night or something dramatically important like that) and rejected her pleas, opting instead to watch my shows on the tiny B&W TV and leave her with the color set. This upset Mom greatly. I held my ground, stubborn adolescent that I was. Finally, in desperation, she came to me and said, rather pathetically, "If you'll come watch the movie with me ... I will pay you $5.00." I just got this sick feeling in my stomach. "Oh, Mom!" I whined. "Fine, fine. I'll come and watch it." I didn't accept the money. I couldn't believe she had done that, but even moreso, I couldn't believe I had let it come to that.

28 November 2008

NaBloPoMo 9: Next Stop: A Gameboy on My Christmas List

Tonight, as we're walking through beautiful downtown St. Charles (MO) and meeting Christmas characters, Laura introduces a term that I'm certain has been around for awhile but I've managed to miss it 'til now. It's the word used to describe today's young'uns:

"Screenagers."

The term, as she explained, refers to the fact that while watching TV, a screenager will also be on his/her laptop and have their cell phone close by. Screens galore.

And as she's telling me this, and we're watching our steps as we walk on the cobblestone sidewalks, I think to myself: Holy Christ -- I'm 43 years old, and she's describing me.

NaBloPoMo 8: A quote from John Irving

One of the pleasures of reading a novel is anticipation. Would a playwright not bother to anticipate what the audience is anticipating? The reader of a novel also enjoys the feeling that he can anticipate where the story is going; however, if the reader actually does anticipate the story, he is bored. The reader must be able to anticipate, but the reader must also guess wrong. How can an author make a reader anticipate—not to mention make a reader guess wrong—if the author himself doesn't know where the story is going? A good beginning will suggest knowledge of the whole story; it will give a strong hint regarding where the whole story is headed; yet a good beginning must be misleading, too.

Therefore, where to begin? Begin where the reader will be invited to d ot he most anticipating of the story, but where the reader will be the most compelled to guess wrong. If anticipation is a pleasure, so is surprise.


-- from his essay "Getting Started" in the compilation Writers On Writing (Middlebury College Press, 1991)

The bad news is, I'm now feeling like I need to reconsider the opening of my novel.

The good news is, I think I know what it needs. Such revisions are never scary when I have at least an inkling of an idea of where I might go. "Scary" is when I have no idea what needs to be fixed.

07 November 2008

NaBloPoMo 7: A Writing Excerpt

I took a marvelous writing class at Northwestern this summer. We only wrote and revised one story in the six weeks, but there was a lot of additional writing on top of this via exercises that were largely derived from two books: Janet Burroway's Writing Fiction: A Guide to Narrative Craft and the better known The Art of Fiction: Notes on Craft for Young Writers by John Gardner; both of these are pretty much required reading for anyone serious about writing fiction).

Those 18 exercises were challenging, but on the nights that I was really into it they were unbelievably fun. I thought I'd share one of my exercises here. You're going to be dropped smack-dab into the middle of a story. The rest of it is not written; honestly, beyond the scene below, the story hasn't even been conceived. But this is one of two or three exercises from that summer class that I could definitely see expanding into something longer and fuller.

•••

THE EXERCISE: Write a scene that shows a character who feels the pressing importance of getting or accomplishing something. That something need not seem significant to others; in fact, most people might find it trivial (e.g., he is terribly embarrassed even though no one seems to notice anything wrong; she must have a certain book from the library; etc.). Purpose: to make a character interesting by showing the intensity of her/his needs or desires.


I was having a hard time concentrating on what the officer was asking. I think I was finally going into something like shock. I was staring at a spot over the policeman’s right shoulder, remembering details of the accident, the point of impact, where the girl had ended up, where her mother landed, the color of the car, any scrap of info on the license plate … I was drowning in unorganized thoughts, when all of a sudden I realized I had been staring at something underneath a parked car.

It was a toy, a Rubik’s Cube. The puzzle was unsolved, a jumble of colored squares. I think the officer was repeating some question about what time it was, but all I could do was fall into those solid squares, count them off, unlock the patterns.

I was in high-school when I got my Cube. Actually, I borrowed it. Okay, stole it. I disappeared to my bedroom for a few afternoons, never quite figuring out the trick to solving it, and finally walking in the rain one day to the mall bookstore to copy down with a ballpoint the solution from a pamphlet on the back of several record store receipts. I mastered the Cube. I got to where I was able to solve it from any position in less than two minutes. Eventually the satisfaction of that ordered universe dulled, and I returned it to the locker from which it had been stolen.

And now the Cube was back. The little girl had been holding it, I remembered that. I didn’t remember seeing it fly when the car struck them. What was playing over and over was the two-part thud — da-THUNK. The sound was so dominant that I didn’t remember hearing tires squeal, though there were straight-as-arrow skid marks. Neither victim uttered a sound, not even of surprise. And the bodies: the mother, in a thin skirt, looking almost birdlike as she traveled; the child, in blue jeans, never really getting to experience grace in her life and certainly not showing it in her final moment.

And now, there it was, at least 50 feet from where the girl ended up. Green squares. Yellow. Red. Blue. Mostly blue. What were the other colors that I couldn’t see? White? Black? Purple?

“Mr. Poidevin,” the officer said, “if you can just bear with me for a few more minutes …”

“I’m sorry, yes, can you excuse me for just a moment?” I asked.

“Just a few more questions,” he said.

“I know, I just need to get … I need to look at something.” I lifted the yellow tape and bent under it.

“Sir!” the officer barked, and then modulated his voice. “Mr. Poidevin, this is a crime scene, and you may not go past the tape.”

“I’m not touching anything,” I muttered. “I just need to … I need to look at something in that car.”

“Which car?” the officer said. He had a hand on my arm now. It was a polite tug-of-war. I remembered when my father would grab me like this. I had learned to shuck out of my nylon windbreaker and get away. That would not be a good idea now.

“The black one, right there. Look, I’ll be right back. Then you can ask me anything.”

“I’m sorry, sir, but we’ve sealed the crime scene. Now, please come back to the other side of the tape.”

We stood still, him and me. I wanted to call him by his name, but now I couldn’t remember it, and I couldn’t take my eyes off my target to look at his badge. The Cube was right there, by the rear wheel of the car, its colors almost pulsing. The girl seemed young to be doing that puzzle. Surely she couldn’t solve it. I could do it, for her. I could put it right.

“I can’t remember …” I started to say. My eyes filled, and the Cube was lost in the blur. I bowed my head, pinched my eyes with thumb and index finger. Deep breath. “Alright, alright,” I said, ducking back under the tape.

The policeman returned to his interview. I thought about making up answers just to end this so that I could get to work on the puzzle, but that would only complicate things. Instead, I tried to focus on the policeman’s face, kept my answers brief, and tried not to give away the Rubik’s Cube’s location.

“That will be it,” he said. As I stepped away, toward the tape again, he added: “I just need your contact information, in case we need to follow up.” He clearly noticed my distress. “Mr. Poidevin, do you need to sit down?”

No, what I need is for you to let me fix the damn puzzle! I thought.

“I’m fine.” As I gave him my address and phone number, I saw another officer walking deliberately in the middle of the street, as if making certain he didn’t step on a land mine. He was studying the asphalt as if he’d lost something. He wore purple latex gloves. He slowly made his way toward the black car and the Cube.

“Thank you, Mr. Poidevin,” my officer said. The investigating officer crouched down. He had seen the toy. He called someone with a camera over.

“That’s mine!” I yelled. My face flushed. Both officers turned to look at me, expecting clarification. “I dropped that, that’s mine!”

Still crouching, the policeman by the car pointed at the Cube. “This?” he asked.

“Yeah. Yeah.”

“Is this your car?” he asked.

I was about to say yes, but my policeman said, “No, that’s his VW over there.” I forgot I had told him that. The photographer moved in for close-ups of the Cube, and then he stepped away, nodding to Officer Gloves.

As the other officer walked over to us, he smiled and said, “We have witnesses who says the child was holding this.”

“Well, they’re wrong,” I said simply.

“So, this is your toy?” my officer said. He was amused. It was a strange place to feel amusement.

I nodded, doing my best to temper my impatience. I allowed a glance at it, and I could almost hear the gratifying sound the Cube being twisted and turned, the calming rhythms, the feeling that my hands and wrists knew how to work together and make everything right.

Having considered my appeal, the gloved officer produced a plastic bag from his pocket, snapped it open, and dropped the Cube in. “Carlos,” he addressed my officer, “give me this guy’s contact info and I’ll attach it.” And then to me: “You can pick it up in a few weeks.”

As he walked away, he shook the bag at his side, and the Cube bounced against his thigh.

06 November 2008

NaBloPoMo 6: The Definition of "Counterintuitive"

This is a gripe that I've had sitting around in my blogger "draft" file for the last two years, and I'm finally going to take the time during NaBloPoMo to finish it.

One of the biggest problems I encounter on a regular basis — and I say this realizing that it will speak volumes about how difficult the life I lead truly is — is the fact that, when inserting a common consumer DVD movie into my DVD player, it takes ... oh ... about 15 minutes to get through all the crap at the beginning before I finally reach the DVD menu where I can finally start the movie.

I wonder how many of us still remember that one of the biggest things we gave up when we left the videocassette behind was the ability to fast-forward through the FBI warning and maybe a movie trailer before getting to the feature film we sat on the couch to enjoy. Those crafty film industry people made certain that — on a vast majority of DVDs, at least — there is absolutely no way to skip the all-important FBI WARNING that you had better not have a room full of admission-paying neighbors with popcorn tubs waiting to enjoy your personal copy of Xanadu. The warning, I'd like to note, that nobody reads because they're too busy pushing every button on your DVD remote to try to skip through the (not one but) two screens of 8-point-sized text about all the dastardly things they can do to you if you go rogue on them.

As if that's not enough, many DVDs also put that same "can't fast-forward" feature on the now numerous trailers stuck after the FBI warning but before you get to the menu. Now, like many, I love movie trailers at the theater. On the rare occasion that Laura and I actually get to take in a grown-up film without our children, we always make sure that we're there in plenty of time to soak up the nonstop highlights of the next Bond film and all the best jokes from the upcoming Adam Sandler flick. The problem with watching trailers on a DVD is that after you've seen the trailers once, you rarely need to ever see them again. After a few months or years, the trailers only serve to annoy you as much as the FBI thing. Yet each time you put the DVD back in the machine, you are once again promised the anticipatory tease of a movie that long ago saw its premiere in theaters ... and on HBO ... and on DVD ... and on basic cable ... and its network broadcast ... and finally in the big "bin o' movies" near the cash registers at your local Walgreen's. And still you can't fast-forward through it.

Now, I know that, on some DVDs, once you're past the FBI warning you can press your "menu" button and skip all that stuff. But I swear I'm finding more and more that DVDs remove that

Enter Disney, the land of imagineers to come up with a solution: Disney FastPlay!

(I have to say: I was stunned to discover that Disney actually has an entire web site — with a lengthy FAQ — discussing this feature. I'm proud to bring you that link now! Please don't skim any of the materials. Read all of it.)

According to the web site, FastPlay is an "exclusive Patent Pending technology" (Yep! those Ps are capitalized, so don't mess with 'em!) featured on all Disney DVDs (mostly animated films — of which, I'm sure you're not surprised to learn, we have many in our house — but also some of the more grown-up movies to come from Disney) that on first glance appears to address my issue. "Consumers who don't want to use their remote," I am told, "can just put in the DVD and it will start to play the movie and a selection of bonus features." Awesome! Problem solved! the first time I saw this. It appeared that Disney had arranged for us to bypass all that crap and get to our movie fast.

Well ... no. When the FastPlay screen comes up, there are two icons on it: the "Disney FastPlay" icon, and a "Main Menu" icon. The first time I saw it, I quickly clicked the FastPlay icon ... and was rewarded with the first of the five or six movie trailers on the DVD. How is this fast? I wondered. I'm not watching my movie yet!

The FastPlay site promises that there will be no need for a remote control: "Disney's FastPlay plays the feature plus a selection of bonus features without pressing a button!" While this is technically true, what it actually does is play all the commercial trailers on the DVD — these must be the bonus features that they were just speaking of — before finally starting your movie. In other words, once you've pressed the FastPlay icon, your DVD does the exact same crappy behavior that it used to do before FastPlay was "invented." You are still sitting through all of the trailers. Nothing has changed ... except that Disney has now created Patent Pending technology to trick you into watching the trailers you used to scramble to skip.

In order to really get to your movie fast, you must avoid the FastPlay button; you must instead choose the "Main Menu" button, which bypasses all the top filler and gets you relatively quickly to your movie. But you had better be quick about it, becaue if you don't get to your remote and navigate off of FastPlay (Disney has helpfully made FastPlay the default button), it'll just choose it for you, and off you go to TrailerLand.

It just seems so typical of a large corporation like Disney to create a feature named in a way to make you believe it does something for you, when in fact it's simply doing something for them.

And yes, this is the kind of crap I am clearly reverting to think about now that the election is over.

05 November 2008

NaBloPoMo 5: Writing in My Sleep

Sleep has a ridiculous effect on my creativity. I love to stay up late, and I can do a lot of things when I'm up past my bedtime, but writing well isn't one of them.

That being said, I'm not sure exactly how I pulled off NaNoWriMo last year as well as I did. I mean, it's certainly not hard for me to generate 50,000 words in a month — and not only did I do that but I also knocked out 30 blog posts that month — but I was actually happy with what I wrote. (Well, not the blog posts — they were crap. But the novel I still like very much.) I know I had the help with a lot of caffeine, and of course there was all that leftover Halloween candy. For some reason, Laura bought a ludicrous amount of mini Tootsie Pops, and I pretty much lived on them during November 2007. I'm not exactly sure how Chris Baty chose November as the best month for NaNoWriMo, but having the marathon kick off with an infusion of refined sugar certainly helped me.

If I'm really gonna churn out words — words that I can be proud of, whether they are for work or for "pleasure" — I need a good amount of sleep. Naps can be very helpful — even a five-minute power-nap can make a huge difference. (In fact, I often come out of those catnaps with the solution to a problem I was having with the work, or with a whole new scene or sequence of scenes almost fully worked out in my head, waiting for transcription.) But if I'm serious about kicking some fiction ass, I need a good eight to ten hours under my belt.

This is part of what has made this year more difficult: I've been working a second freelance job that involves a lot of reading, writing and thinking. So after the girls have gone to bed and I've taken care of the most important cultural duty (watching The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and The Colbert Report), I have to dig into the work on this other job. By the time that is done, I have no energy left for more creative pursuits.

My mom's favorite line recently has been: "Take care of yourself first; the writing will be there waiting for you when the right time comes." That's very sweet. Sane, even. But it's hard for me not to feel like every day not spent writing is one less day I'll have in my life to complete the stuff I'm doing. I want to keep writing!

It's a sad irony that I want to draw on my life as inspiration for good writing, but life keeps getting in the way of my writing.